Startup Originals Team
Union Minister Nitin Gadkari has hit back at critics who have raised allegations against him related to the government’s ethanol blending policy. Speaking in Nagpur, Gadkari asserted his integrity by saying his intellect is worth ₹200 crore a month and that he has always earned honestly, rejecting claims of any wrongdoing.
What Gadkari Said:
- Gadkari addressed the ethanol blending controversy during an event by the Agricos Welfare Society in Nagpur, where he stated, “My brain is worth ₹200 crore per month. I am not at all short of money and I don’t stoop low.”
- He also said, “I know how to earn with honesty,” and emphasized that his income and business suggestions are guided by development, not by personal profit.
Context & Background of the Ethanol Policy Row:
- The controversy stems from the government’s push for E20 petrol (fuel with 20% ethanol blend), which has drawn criticism over concerns like vehicle compatibility, safety, claims of reduced fuel efficiency, and possible conflict of interest involving companies linked to Gadkari’s family.
- Critics have alleged that two major ethanol companies are operated by Gadkari’s sons, raising suspicions about whether there is any undue influence or benefit involved. Gadkari responded that while he gives business ideas to his sons, he does not “resort to fraud.”
Defending the Ethanol Policy:
- Gadkari defended the ethanol blending policy as beneficial for farmers and for reducing fossil fuel imports. He pointed out that it has given sugarcane and maize farmers better income and kept the sugar industry afloat.
- He also said concerns about engine damage, loss of mileage, or vehicle warranties are overblown. According to him, all testing agencies have confirmed there are no serious problems with implementing E20 petrol.
Gadkari’s Response to Critics:
- He described the criticism as part of a “paid campaign” on social media, suggesting the allegations are politically motivated rather than based on evidence.
- He made it clear that his actions and suggestions (such as business ideas for his sons, or ventures like sugar factories, distilleries, and power plants that he owns) are legal and transparent. He claimed he is not chasing profit through unethical means.
Why This Statement Matters:
- With ethanol blending being a key part of India’s environmental and energy policy (promoting cleaner fuel, boosting farmer income, reducing import dependency), allegations against its implementation have political and economic weight. Gadkari’s strong rebuttal underscores how serious these allegations are, and how much reputation, policy clarity, and public opinion matter.
- His claim about the worth of his intellect is a dramatic and unusual rhetorical move, meant to send a message of confidence and detachment from accusations of financial motives.
Conclusion:
Nitin Gadkari’s comments come at a time when the ethanol policy (especially E20 petrol) is under public scrutiny. By stating that his “brain is worth ₹200 crore a month” and insisting on honest earnings, he has framed the controversy as one of personal integrity vs political attack. Whether this settles the debate or intensifies it will depend heavily on how the allegations are addressed, and how transparently the ethanol blending policy is implemented moving forward.
